Sale and Rent Back Schemes, What They Are and Why the FCA Regulates Them
Sale and rent back schemes promise to solve financial distress by letting you sell your home and continue living in it as a tenant. In reality, most cases end badly for sellers. This guide explains how these schemes work, why the FCA regulates them, and what alternatives exist.
Published: 16 Mar 2026 · Updated: 16 Mar 2026 · 9 min read
What Is Sale and Rent Back?
A sale and rent back (SRB) scheme is an arrangement under which a homeowner sells their property to a company or individual at a discount to market value, then continues to live in the property as a tenant, paying rent to the new owner.
The appeal is obvious: the seller receives a lump sum from the sale (often to clear debts or avoid repossession), while retaining the right to continue living in their home without having to move. It sounds like a solution to financial distress that preserves the stability of not having to uproot.
In practice, the combination of a substantial discount on sale and insecure tenure has led to widespread consumer harm, which is why the sector is regulated by the **Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)**.
Why the FCA Regulates Sale and Rent Back
Before 2009, the SRB sector was largely unregulated. Companies operated with minimal transparency, sellers frequently received far less than the market value of their property, and, critically, the tenancy agreements offered were short-term and insecure, leaving sellers vulnerable to eviction within months of completing the sale.
The FCA brought SRB within its regulatory perimeter in **June 2009** under the **Mortgage and Home Finance: Conduct of Business (MCOB)** sourcebook. From that point, firms offering regulated SRB arrangements must be:
- Authorised by the FCA
- Subject to FCA conduct of business rules
- Required to provide a personalised illustration of the arrangement's costs and terms
- Required to give the seller at least five business days to consider the offer
Regulated SRB arrangements must also offer the seller a minimum tenancy of five years. This addressed the key problem of short-term tenancies that left sellers homeless within months.
**However:** Many SRB transactions do not fall within the regulated framework. Arrangements made between private individuals, or structured to avoid the regulatory definition, are not subject to FCA oversight. The burden is on the seller to verify that any firm they deal with is FCA-authorised.
To check whether a firm is FCA-authorised: visit the FCA Financial Services Register at register.fca.org.uk.
The Typical Terms, and Why They Rarely Favour the Seller
The Discount
SRB companies purchase at a significant discount to market value, typically **25–40% below** an independently assessed open market price. This discount is presented as the price of the flexibility and speed the arrangement provides.
In practice, the discount means the seller crystallises a significant loss on their home. A property worth £250,000 sold at a 35% discount realises £162,500, a loss of £87,500 compared to an open market sale.
For many sellers in severe financial distress, the outstanding mortgage and secured debts may consume most of the sale proceeds, leaving relatively little in hand. The nominal benefit of staying in the property may be the main appeal, but that benefit depends on the quality of the tenancy offered.
Security of Tenure
Even in regulated arrangements requiring a five-year tenancy, the seller becomes a tenant with no right to purchase the property back and no security beyond the tenancy term. After five years, the new landlord can seek possession. Rent can be increased at review. The new owner can sell the property to another investor.
In unregulated arrangements, many sellers have found themselves evicted within 12 months of completing the sale, having received a below-market price and lost their home.
The Emotional Dynamic
Sellers who approach SRB companies are almost always in some form of financial or emotional distress, facing repossession, debt, bereavement, or relationship breakdown. This creates an inherently unequal negotiating dynamic. The seller is under pressure; the company is not.
Reputable SRB firms will encourage the seller to take independent legal advice before proceeding. Any firm that discourages independent advice should be treated with extreme caution.
When Sale and Rent Back Might Make Sense
Despite the risks, there are narrow circumstances where a regulated SRB arrangement may be appropriate:
- The seller faces imminent mortgage possession proceedings and needs immediate resolution
- All alternative debt restructuring options have been exhausted
- The seller has health or mobility reasons that make relocation extremely difficult
- The seller has obtained independent legal and financial advice and understands the full terms
Even in these circumstances, the seller should obtain a formal independent valuation before agreeing to a purchase price, and should not accept a discount beyond what is genuinely necessary to achieve the sale.
Alternatives to Sale and Rent Back
Before agreeing to an SRB arrangement, explore these alternatives:
Mortgage Forbearance
Contact your mortgage lender directly. Most major lenders have hardship support teams and can offer:
- Temporary payment holidays
- Switching to interest-only payments
- Extending the mortgage term to reduce monthly payments
The FCA's Mortgage Conduct of Business rules require lenders to treat customers in financial difficulty fairly and to consider alternatives to possession.
Debt Restructuring
A debt management plan or Individual Voluntary Arrangement (IVA) may allow you to restructure unsecured debts and reduce your monthly outgoings to an affordable level, without the need to sell the property at all.
**StepChange Debt Charity** (0800 138 1111) provides free, confidential debt advice and can assess all available options.
Equity Release
For homeowners aged 55 or over, equity release (a lifetime mortgage or home reversion plan) may allow you to access a tax-free lump sum from your property's value without selling. These products are regulated by the FCA and governed by the Equity Release Council's code of conduct. They carry their own risks (compound interest, impact on estate value) but are typically less harmful than SRB for eligible borrowers.
Open Market Sale With Social Housing Application
If your financial situation requires selling the property, an open market sale at full value followed by an application to the local authority's housing register may provide a better long-term housing outcome than an SRB arrangement, even accounting for the difficulty of securing social housing.
Summary: The Key Risks
| Risk | Description |
|---|---|
| Large discount | Typically 25–40% below market value |
| Insecure tenancy | Regulated minimum 5 years; unregulated may be as short as 6 months |
| Rent increases | Landlord can increase rent at review; no right to buy back |
| Eviction risk | After tenancy term expires, landlord can seek possession |
| Unregulated firms | Many SRB providers are not FCA-authorised, no consumer protections apply |
Property Passport UK
If you are considering an SRB arrangement, the first step is to establish an independent valuation of your property. Property Passport UK provides sold price history and comparable data that you can use alongside a professional RICS valuation to verify whether the price offered by an SRB company is genuinely within an acceptable discount range, or significantly below it.
More Selling a Property guides
Upfront Property Information & the Home Buying Reform, What Sellers and Agents Need to Know
9 min readMaterial Information in Property Listings, What Estate Agents and Sellers Must Disclose
7 min readWhat Documents Do You Need to Sell Your House in the UK?
7 min readRelated calculators
Search any property in England & Wales
EPC ratings, flood risk, sold prices, and planning data — free, instant, no login required.